Generator Portofolio Pengajaran Dosen Berbasis Web


Muhammad Derry Salman Syahid, Heru Nugroho, Siska Komala Sari


Salah satu acuan utama dalam proses perbaikan pengajaran di Universitas Telkom adalah dokumen portofolio pengajaran dosen. Selain sebagai bagian dari evaluasi dalam proses pembelajaran juga menjadi salah satu komponen penilaian dari kinerja dosen. Namun demikain, dalam proses pembuatannya terdapat kendala sehingga dosen telat mengumpukan bahkan tidak mengumpulkan dokumen portfolio dari mata kuliah yang diampunya. Hal ini akan membatasi proses perbaikan mutu pengajaran pada tahun ajaran selanjutnya. Oleh karena itu diperlukan tools otomasi yang dapat melakukan sebuah aplikasi yang mampu generate komponen data yang dibutuhkan dalam penyusunan portfolio. Metodologi yang digunakan untuk penelitian ini adalah information system design science research dengan pengembangan perangkat lunak menggunakan model waterfal. Metode black box testing dan user acceptance test digunakan untuk pengujian pasa setiap fungsionalitas yang terdapat dalam aplikasi. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa aplikasi tersebut mengatasi kendala yang dihadapi saat ini oleh seluruh dosen pada Program Studi Diploma III Sistem Informasi Fakultas Ilmu Terapan Universitas Telkom.



The Lecturer teaching portfolio document is a document that is used as the main reference in the process of teaching improvement at Telkom University. Aside from being part of the evaluation, it also becomes one of the evaluation components of the lecturer's performance. However, in the process of making, there are obstacles, so that the late lecturer does not even collect portfolio documents from the courses he is in charge of. This will limit the teaching quality improvement process in the next academic year. Therefore, automation tools are needed that can create an application that is able to generate the data components needed in the preparation of the portfolio. The methodology used for this research is information system design science research with software development using the waterfall model. Every functionality contained in this application has been through a series of tests using the black box testing method, and user acceptance tests. The test results show that the application has successfully overcome the constraints currently faced by all lecturers in the Diploma III Information System Study Program, Applied Sciences School, Telkom University.

Teks Lengkap:



A.F. RAGAB, M. and ARISHA, A., 2013. Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), pp.873–901.

AKLEH, A. and WAHAB, R.A., 2020. Effectiveness of course portfolio in improving course quality at higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), pp.39–48.

ALEXIOU, A. and PARASKEVA, F., 2019. Examining self-regulated learning through a social networking ePortfolio in higher education. International Journal of Learning Technology, 14(2), p.162.

BECERRA-FERNANDEZ, I. and SABHERWAL, R., 2010. Knowledge management: systems and processes.

BHATTACHARYA, M. and HARTNETT, M., 2007. E-portfolio assessment in higher education. In: 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference - global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports. [online] 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference - global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports. Milwaukee, WI, USA: IEEE. pp.T1G-19-T1G-24.

BOHOLANO, H.B., SANCHEZ, J.M.P., BALO, V.T.M. AND NAVARRO, T.M.M., 2022. Utilization of e-Portfolios in Teacher Education Institutions of Higher Education in Central Visayas, Philippines. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9), pp.912–920.

CALIMAG, M.M.P., 2021. The ePortfolio: Technology-Enhanced Authentic Assessment in the Continuum of Medical Education. In: A.S. Moura, P. Reis and M.N.D.S. Cordeiro, eds. Advances in Mobile and Distance Learning. [online] IGI Global. pp.149–170.

CIESIELKIEWICZ, M., WISSER, W. AND ROZELLS, D., 2019. International Perspectives on ePortfolios in Higher Education: Case Studies from Asia, North America and Europe. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(21), p.96.

DOĞAN, S., BETIN-CAN, A. AND GAROUSI, V., 2014. Web application testing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 91, pp.174–201.

FRAN MUES AND MARY DEANE SORCINELLI, 2000. Preparing a Teaching Portfolio.

GUTIÉRREZ-SANTIUSTE, E., GARCÍA-SEGURA, S., OLIVARES-GARCÍA, M.Á. AND GONZÁLEZ-ALFAYA, E., 2022. Higher Education Students’ Perception of the E-Portfolio as a Tool for Improving Their Employability: Weaknesses and Strengths. Education Sciences, 12(5), p.321.

HANADI SOUDAH - YOUNAN, C., JEANNE/ MARY KATTAN, AND MAI AL - QASSASFEH, 2017. Guide to Creating a Course Portfolio. Available at: [Accessed 2 December 2019].

HINOJOSA-PAREJA, E.F., GUTIÉRREZ-SANTIUSTE, E. AND GÁMIZ-SÁNCHEZ, V., 2021. Construction and validation of a Questionnaire on E-portfolios in Higher Education (QEPHE). International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 44(1), pp.53–66.

HORWITCH, M. AND ARMACOST, R., 2002. Helping Knowledge Management Be All It Can Be. Journal of Business Strategy, 23(3), pp.26–31.

JAFARI NAVIMIPOUR, N. AND CHARBANd, Y., 2016. Knowledge sharing mechanisms and techniques in project teams: Literature review, classification, and current trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, pp.730–742.

LARREA, M.L., 2017. Black-Box Testing Technique for Information Visualization. Sequencing Constraints with Low-Level Interactions. 17(1), p.12.

MUDAU, P.K., 2022. Lecturers’ Views on the Functionality of e-Portfolio as Alternative Assessment in an Open Distance e-Learning. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(1), pp.81–90.

NAGLE, L., O’ CONNELL, M. AND FARRELLY, T., 2019. A gap in governance: acknowledging the challenges of organic ePortfolio implementation. Educational Media International, 56(4), pp.328–342.

NGUI, W., PANG, V. AND HIEW, W., 2020. Designing and developing an e-portfolio for second language learners in higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(5), pp.362–366.

OLANIYI, N., 2020. A survey on the use of e-portfolios as a form of assessment in online computer science courses. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, 332 LNICST, pp.263–277.

PATHAK, M.S.V., n.d. Acceptance Testing Technique: A Survey along with Its Operating Frameworks. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 4(4), p.4.

PATTON, R., 2001. Software testing. Indianapolis, Ind: Sams.

PEFFERS, K., TUUNANEN, T., ROTHENBERGER, M.A. AND CHATTERJEE, S., 2007. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), pp.45–77.

RAMAKRISHNAN, 2012. System Analysis and Design. Journal of Information Technology & Software Engineering, [online] 02(05).

ROCO, M. AND BARBERÀ, E., 2022. ePortfolio to promote networked learning: an experience in the Latin American context. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, [online] 19(1).

SCULLY, D., MICHAEL O ’ LEARY AND BROWn, M., 2018. The Learning Portfolio in Higher Education: ‘A Game of Snakes and Ladders’. [online]

SULTANA, F., LIM, C.P. AND LIANG, M., 2020. E-portfolios and the development of students’ reflective thinking at a Hong Kong University. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(3), pp.277–294.

Teaching Assistant Fellows, 2000. Handbook for Creating Course Portfolios. Available at: [Accessed 2 December 2019].

VÁZQUEZ, A.B., OROZCO, A.M., PÉREZ, A.A. AND SIERRA, F.S., 2021. The e-portfolio in higher education: The case of a line of teaching innovation and complex change management. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 9(1), pp.29–64.

WALLAND, E. AND SHAW, S., 2022. E-portfolios in teaching, learning and assessment: tensions in theory and praxis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), pp.363–379.

WANG, J., DING, D., LIU, O. AND LI, M., 2016. A synthetic method for knowledge management performance evaluation based on triangular fuzzy number and group support systems. Applied Soft Computing, 39, pp.11–20.