Implementasi Wireless Sensor Network: Perbandingan Metode Inverse Distance Weight dan Ordinary Kriging untuk Estimasi Kadar Gas Amonia pada Lingkungan Peternakan

Penulis

  • Imam Ahmad Ashari Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Banyumas
  • Retno Agus Setiawan Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Banyumas
  • Khoriun Nisa' Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Banyumas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2022934394

Abstrak

Wireless Sensor Network merupakan salah satu teknologi yang menjadi tren saat ini.  Salah satu sektor bidang yang banyak memanfaatkan penerapan teknologi ini adalah agrikultur. WSN banyak digunakan dalam mengatasi permasalahan di sektor agrikultur, salah satunya pada sektor peternakan. Permasalahan yang sering terjadi di industri peternakan adalah gas beracun yang timbul dari kotoran hewan ternak, yaitu amonia. Peningkatan konsentrasi gas amonia di peternakan dapat menyebabkan keracunan serta kematian unggas ketika mencapai kadar konsentrasi tertentu. Dengan pemanfaatan teknologi WSN kadar gas amonia di lingkungan peternakan dapat diketahui secara realtime. Hanya saja besarnya biaya menjadi kendala pemasangan perangkat WSN di lingkungan peternakan. Oleh karena itu pada penelitian ini di usulkan metode yang mampu mengetahui persebaran gas amonia hanya dengan menggunakan beberapa titik stasiun pemantauan. Metode interpolasi mampu mengatasi permasalahan tersebut. Metode interpolasi yang di pakai dalam penelitian ini adalah metode Inverse Distance Weight (IDW) dan Ordinary Kriging (OK). Dari hasil pengujian menggunakan model MAPE metode IDW menghasilkan nilai MAPE sebesar 23,45% dan metode OK mengasilkan nilai MAPE sebesar 24,95%. Dari hasil pengujian tersebut menunjukkan bahwa metode IDW lebih baik daripada metode OK dalam menentukan nilai taksiran gas amonia di suatu titik lokasi.

 

Abstract

 Wireless Sensor Network is a technology that is becoming a trend today. WSN is widely used in overcoming problems in the subfield of agricultural, livestock. The problem that often occurs in the livestock industries is the poisonous gas that arises from livestock manure, namely amonia. Increasing the concentration of amonia in the farm can cause poisoning and death of poultry when it reaches a certain concentration. With the use of WSN technology, amonia gas levels in the livestock environment can be known in realtime. It's just that the high cost becomes an obstacle to installing WSN equipment in the farm environment. Therefore, this research proposes a method that is able to determine the distribution of amonia gas only by using several monitoring stations. The interpolation method is able to overcome these problems. The interpolation method used in this study is the Inverse Distance Weight (IDW) and Ordinary Kriging (OK) method. From the test results using the MAPE model, the IDW method produces a MAPE value of 23.45% and the OK method produces a MAPE value of 24.95%. From the test results, it shows that the IDW method is better than the OK method in determining the estimated value of amonia gas at a certain location.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Referensi

ADHIKARY, S.K., MUTTIL, N., & YILMAZ, A. G., 2016. Genetic programming-based ordinary kriging for spatial interpolation of rainfall. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21(2), p.04015062.

ASHARI, I.A., WIDODO, A.P., & SURYONO, S., 2019. The Monitoring System for Amonia Gas (NH3) Hazard Detection in the Livestock Environment uses Inverse Distance Weight Method. In 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing, pp.1-6.

ELUMALAI, V., BRINDHA, K., SITHOLE, B., & LAKSHMANAN, E., 2017. Spatial interpolation methods and geostatistics for mapping groundwater contamination in a coastal area. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(12), p.11601-11617.

FRIDAYANI, N.M. S., KENCANA, I.P.E.N., & SUKARSA, K.G., 2012. Perbandingan Interpolasi Spasial Dengan Metode Ordinary dan Robust Kriging pada Data Spasial Berpencilan (Studi Kasus: Curah Hujan di Kabupaten Karangasem). e-jurnal Matematika.

GARCÍA-FLORES, R., TOSCAS, P., LEE, D.J., GAVRILIOUK, O., & ROBINSON, G., 2012. A comparison of methods for solving the sensor location problem. In Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Springer, Dordrecht., pp.531-542.

GETIS, A., & FISCHER, M.M., 2010. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools. Methods and Appli.

GRZELKA, A., SÓWKA, I. & MILLER, U., 2018. Metody oceny emisji odorów z obiektów gospodarki hodowlanej. Inżynieria Ekologiczna, 19(2), p.56-64.

KE, W., CHENG, H.P., YAN, D., & LIN, C., 2011. The application of cluster analysis and inverse distance-weighted interpolation to appraising the water quality of three Forks Lake. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10(1), p.2511-2517.

KOŚMIDER, J., MAZUR-CHRZANOWSKA, B. & WYSZYŃSKI, B., 2012. Odory [Odours]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

KUMAR, V., 2006. Remadevi (2006) Kriging of groundwater levels—a case study. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 6(1), p.81-94.

LIN, C. C., DENG, D.J., CHEN, Z.Y., & CHEN, K.C., 2016. Key design of driving industri 4.0: Joint energi-efficient deployment and scheduling in group-based industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(10), p.46-52.

QIAO, P., LEI, M., YANG, S., YANG, J., GUO, G., & ZHOU, X., 2018. Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(16), p.15597-15608.

MIRZAEI, R., & SAKIZADEH, M., 2016. Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(3), p.2758-2769.

RASHID, B., & REHMANI, M. H., 2016. Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey. Journal of network and computer applications, 60(1), p.192-219.

SHAHBEIK, S., AFZAL, P., MOAREFVAND, P., & QUMARSY, M., 2014. Comparison between ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighted (IDW) based on estimation error. Case study: Dardevey iron ore deposit, NE Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(9), p.3693-3704.

SHAIKH, F.K., & ZEADALLY, S., 2016. Energi harvesting in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energi Reviews, 55(1), p.1041-1054.

UMER, M., KULIK, L., & TANIN, E., 2010. Spatial interpolation in wireless sensor networks: localized algorithms for variogram modeling and Kriging. Geoinformatica, 14(1), p.101-134.

XIE, Y., CHEN, T.B., LEI, M., YANG, J., GUO, Q.J., SONG, B., & ZHOU, X.Y., 2011. Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: Accuracy and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere, 82(3), p.468-476.

ZHANG, X., & SRINIVASAN, R., 2009. GIS‐based spatial precipitation estimation: a comparison of geostatistical approaches 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45(4), p.894-906.

Diterbitkan

31-10-2022

Terbitan

Bagian

Ilmu Komputer

Cara Mengutip

Implementasi Wireless Sensor Network: Perbandingan Metode Inverse Distance Weight dan Ordinary Kriging untuk Estimasi Kadar Gas Amonia pada Lingkungan Peternakan. (2022). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 9(5), 883-888. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2022934394