Systematic Literature Review di Bidang Sistem Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer


Diah Priharsari


Salah satu pendekatan studi pustaka adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Walaupun sudah terdapat banyak naskah berbahasa Indonesia atau asing yang menggunakan SLR sebagai metodologi dalam penelitiannya, namun naskah berbahasa Indonesia yang mengulas tentang SLR masih terbatas atau malah tidak ada. Pada paper ini dirangkumkan langkah-langkah SLR berdasarkan publikasi-publikasi di jurnal berkualitas. Naskah ini berisi panduan untuk melakukan SLR bagi peneliti-peneliti pemula. Isi naskah ini meliputi: metode SLR yang terdiri dari empat tahap (menentukan tujuan SLR, inisiasi dan pemilihan pustaka, analisis dan coding, dan perencanaan untuk mempresentasikan hasil), penentuan kualitas SLR, dan kritik untuk SLR.



This paper provides a guideline for novel researchers to conduct SLR. Although SLR method is quite familiar in Indonesia, a complete essay that explains about SLR in Indonesia is hard to find. This paper resumes SLR stages from various papers published in high quality journals. This paper includes: four stages of conducting SLR (identifying the SLR objectives, searching strategies dan pilot searching, coding and analysing, and presenting the findings), things to be considered to evaluate SLR quality, and critics to SLR.

Teks Lengkap:



G. PARÉ, M.-C. TRUDEL, M. JAANA, AND S. KITSIOU. 2015. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Inf. Manag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 183–199.

F. ROWE. 2014. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations,” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 23, pp. 241–255.

J. WEBSTER AND R. T. WATSON. 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Mis Q., pp. xiii–xxiii, 2002.

P. BRERETON, B. A. KITCHENHAM, D. BUDGEN, M. TURNER, AND M. KHALIL. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 571–583.

C. OKOLI AND K. SCHABRAM. 2010. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts Work. Pap. Inf. Syst, vol. 10, p. 26.

C. F. DURACH, J. KEMBRO, AND A. WIELAND. 2017. A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management,” J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 67–85.

S. K. BOELL AND D. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC. 2015. On being ‘systematic’in literature reviews in IS. J. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 161–173.

S. MACDONELL, M. SHEPPERD, B. KITCHENHAM, AND E. MENDES. 2010. How reliable are systematic reviews in empirical software engineering?. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 676–687.

HANNAH AND SNYDER. 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339.

A. SCHWARZ, M. MEHTA, N. JOHNSON, AND W. W. CHIN. 2007. Understanding frameworks and reviews: a commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past. ACM SIGMIS Database DATABASE Adv. Inf. Syst., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 29–50.

B. KITCHENHAM. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” in Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE, Keele University and University of Durham.

S. S. ERFANI, Y. BLOUNT, AND B. ABEDIN. 2016. The influence of health-specific social network site use on the psychological well-being of cancer-affected people. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 467–476.

U. OF YORK. CENTRE FOR REVIEWS. 2009. Dissemination, and J. Akers, Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.

J. MINGERS AND C. STANDING. 2017. Why things happen – Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms,” Inf. Organ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 171–189, doi:

C. K. WILLIAMS AND D. E. WYNN JR. 2018. A critical realist script for creative theorising in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–11.

S. S. ERFANI AND B. ABEDIN. 2018. Impacts of the use of social network sites on users’ psychological well‐being: A systematic review. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 900–912.

D. PRIHARSARI, B. ABEDIN, AND E. MASTIO. 2020. Value Co-Creation in Firm Sponsored Online Communities: What Enables, Constrains, and Shapes Value. Internet Res.

J. R. GAMBLE, M. BRENNAN, AND R. MCADAM. 2016. A contemporary and systematic literature review of user-centric innovation: A consumer perspective. Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 45, doi: 10.1142/S1363919616500110.

D. TRANFIELD, D. DENYER, AND P. SMART. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review,” Br. J. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207–222.

K. KRIPPENDORFF. 1989. Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.). Int. Encycl. Commun., vol. 1, pp. 403–407.

S. STEMLER. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Pract. assessment, Res. Eval., vol. 7, no. 17, pp. 137–146.

W. A. CRAM, J. D’ARCY, AND J. G. PROUDFOOT. 2019. Seeing the forest and the trees: a meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. MIS Q., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 525–554.

J. SALDANA. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed. California: Sage.

D. PRIHARSARI. 2019. Value Co-Creation in Firm Sponsored Online Communities of Interest: Enablers, Constraints, and Shaper.

A. S. HUFF. 2008. Designing research for publication. Sage.

N. MAYS AND C. POPE. 2000. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ Br. Med. J., vol. 320, no. 7226, p. 50.

R. K. YIN. 2018. Case Study Research and Application: Design and MEthods, 6th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.

S. K. BOELL AND D. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC. 2014. A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 34, pp. 257–286.