Evaluasi Kinerja pelaksanaan Anggaran Berbasis Fuzzy Inference System

Penulis

Sukarna Sukarna, Irman Hermadi, Yani Nurhadryani

Abstrak

Kinerja Pemerintah merupakan output kinerja kementerian/lembaga yang diimplementasikan dalam Perjanjian Kinerja. Laporan Kinerja adalah bentuk pertanggungjawaban kementerian terhadap Perjanjian Kinerja yang disusun secara bertahap dari unit kerja, unit organisasi, dan kementerian. Capaian kinerja aggaran tingkat Kementerian Pertanian tahun 2019 sebesar 94.56% (kategori sangat baik) namun nilai efisiensi anggaran tingkat kementerian sebesar 71,89% yang disebabkan oleh belum efisiennya penggunaan anggaran terhadap capain target. Penelitian ini menggunakan fuzzy inference system  Mamdani untuk menentukan status capaian kinerja di unit kerja Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian (BPTP) Jawa Tengah berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan nomor 214 tahun 2017. Aspek penilaian terdiri dari aspek manfaat dan aspek implementasi. Hasil penelitian ini adalah monitoring dan evaluasi kinerja tingkat unit kerja berupa status capaian kinerja berdasarkan realisasi anggaran riil dengan kriteria sangat kurang, kurang, cukup, baik, dan baik sekali. Implementasi sistem  berbasis web  dengan nilai evaluasi usability menggunakan use questionnaire untuk masing-masing kategori yaitu US sebesar 5.98, EU sebesar 5.25, EL sebesar 5.75, dan SC sebesar 5.17. Pengujian status capaian kinerja unit kerja than 2019 dengan penilaian pakar menujukkan hasil yang sama yaitu kategori sangat baik.

 

Abtract

Government performance was the output of the performance of the ministry/agency implemented in the performance agreement. Performance report was a form of ministerial accountability to performance agreements that were arranged in stages from work units, organizational units, and ministries.  The achievement of the budget performance at the ministry of agriculture in 2019 was 94.56% (very good category) but the efficiency value of the ministry leveled budget was 71.89% due to the inefficient used of the budget towards target achievement, it is necessary to monitoring and evaluate budget performace.  Measurement and assesment of the achievement of budget execution performance based on PMK Number 214 of 2017 consists of implementation aspects (budget absorption, consistency between planning and implementation, achievement of outputs, and efficiency). The studied objective was to facilitate works units in monitoring and evaluate budget performance by presenting accurate and actual performance information as a function of internal control using  the mamdani fuzzy inference system to determine the status of performance achievements. Mamdan’s model can describe skills for intuitive problems that have an output in the form of values in the domain of fuzzy sets categorized under the linguistic component. The results of this studied are monitoring and evaluation of the web-based work unit in the form of real performance status as a basis for preparing recommendations in  order to improve budget performance.  The usability evaluation of the system used a use questionnaire for each category, namely US 5.98, EU 5.25, EL 5.75, and SC 5.17.  Whitebox testing against 25 rule bases shows the results as expected. Testing the status of work unit performance achievements in 2019 with expert assessments shows the same results, namely the very good category.

 

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


BPK (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan), 2019. Laporan Tahunan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK 2018). [online] Tersedia di : [Diakses 30 Agustus 2020].

BPTP (Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Jawa Tengah), 2020. Laporan Kinerja 2019. [online] Tersedia di : [Diakses 17 Mar. 2020].

DENNIS, A., WIXOM, B.H., dan TEGARDEN, D., 2015. SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN An Object-Oriented Approach with UML. Fifth Edit. New Jersey (US): J.Wiley.

DUNN, W.N., 2018. Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Sixth Edition. New York (US): Routledge.

HARDLIFE, Z. dan ZHOU, G., 2013. Utilisation of monitoring and evaluation systems by development agencies: The case of the UNDP in Zimbabwe. Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res. pp.70–83.

HOLZINGER A. 2005. Usability engineering methods for software developers. Commun. ACM48(1). pp.71–74.

HUDEC, M., 2016. Fuzziness In Information Systems. Switzerland (CHE): Springer Nature.

ISO 9126. 2000. Information technology — Software product quality. Iso/Iec Fdis 9126-1 20001–26. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1670 (199603)2:1<35::AID-SPIP29>3.0.CO;2-3.

KEMENTAN (Kementerian Pertanian), 2020. Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2019. [online] Tersedia di : [Diakses 14 April 2020].

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2006 tentang Pelaporan Keuangan dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 214/PMK.02/2017 Tahun 2017, 2017. Pengukuran dan Evaluasi Kinerja Atas Pelaksanaan Rencana Kerja dan Pelaksanaan Anggaran Kementerian/ Lembaga. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

KUSEK, J.Z., and RIST RC. 2004. 10 Steps To Result-Based Monitoring And Evaluation. Washington DC (US): World Bank.

LAUDON, K.C. dan LAUDON, J.P., 2014. Management Information System : Managing The Digital Firm. New York (US): Pearson Education.

LUTHANS, F., 2011. Organizational Behavoiur : An Evidence-Based Approach. Twelfth Edition. New York (US): McGraw-Hill.

MENDEL, J.M., 2017. Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Systems. Introduction And New Direction. Cham (SUI): Springer Nature.

NIELSEN, J., 2012. Usability 101 : Introduction to usability. [online] Tersedia di: [Diakses 17 Februari 2020].

NOFRIANSYAH, D. dan DEFIT, S., 2017. Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDN). Yogyakarta (ID): Deepublish.

OJHA, V., ABRAHAM, A., dan SNÁŠEL, V., 2019. Heuristic design of fuzzy inference systems: A review of three decades of research. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell, pp.845–864.

PETTER, S., DELONE, W., dan MCLEAN, E., 2008. Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, pp.236–263.

ROSSIGNOLI, S., COTICCHIA, F., dan MEZZASALMA, A., 2015. A critical friend: Monitoring and evaluation systems, development cooperation and local government. The case of Tuscany. Eval. Program Plann, pp. 5063–76.

WAYLEN, K.A., BLACKSTOCK, K.L., VAN HULST, F.J., DAMIAN, C., HORVÁTH, F., JOHNSON, R.K., KANKA, R., KÜLVIK, M., MACLEOD, C.J.A., dan MEISSNER, K., 2019. Policy-driven monitoring and evaluation: Does it support adaptive management of socio-ecological systems? Sci. Total Environ. 662, pp.373–384..




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2021833848