Taksonomi Dan Formalisasi Relasi Antar Model Proses Bisnis Berbasis Anotasi Efek

Penulis

  • Tri Astoto Kurniawan Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201743393

Abstrak

Abstrak

Sebuah institusi, baik privat maupun nonprivat, bisa memiliki puluhan, ratusan bahkan ribuan proses bisnis yang dimodelkan dengan menggunakan bahasa pemodelan tertentu. Manajemen model sebanyak itu tidak mudah, terlebih lagi dengan adanya relasi antar model yang harus dikelola. Sehingga, alat bantu untuk memudahkan pengelolaan model proses bisnis tersebut sangat diperlukan, terlebih oleh institusi-institusi bisnis, guna mendukung kemampuannya untuk berkompetisi dalam persaingan bisnis yang sangat ketat. Untuk itu, penentuan taksonomi dan formalisasi relasi antar model menjadi aspek mendasar yang harus dilakukan agar alat bantu tersebut mampu memproses secara otomatis aspek-aspek yang diperlukan dalam pengelolaan model pada sebuah repositori proses bisnis. Pendefinisian taksonomi dan formalisasi relasi antar model proses bisnis menjadi kontribusi penting dari penelitian ini. Artikel ini membahas hal tersebut dengan mengacu pada anotasi efek yang diberikan pada setiap model proses bisnis, yang dimodelkan dengan BPMN. Artikel ini merupakan perbaikan dan penyempurnaan atas pendekatan yang sudah pernah dibahas oleh penulis pada publikasi sebelumnya. Ada tiga jenis relasi yang dibahas, yaitu part-whole, inter-operation, generalization-specialization. Taksonomi dan formalisasi relasi antar model proses bisnis ini diharapkan bisa membantu analis proses bisnis untuk menentukan secara tepat dan konsisten relasi-relasi yang ada dalam sebuah repositori proses bisnis yang kompleks.

Kata kunci: anotasi efek, relasi, model proses bisnis, manajemen proses bisnis, taksonomi, formalisasi


Abstract

An institution, either private or non-private, may have tens, hundreds even thousands of business processes which are modeled in a particular business process modeling language. Managing such models is not a trivial task, especially in dealing with inter-process relationships. Thus, a tool is required to assist any process analyst in managing such business process models, especially by enterprises, in order to strengthen their competitiveness in their hard business environment. As such, defining the taxonomy of inter-process relationships dan formalizing them become a fundamental aspect as the basis for such tool to be able to automatically proceed any aspect of model management in a business process repository. Such taxonomy definition and formalization of inter-process relationships become the important contribution of this research. This article discusses such idea using effect annotation which is semantically applied to a business process, modeled in BPMN. It becomes a correction and improvement of the approach discussed in our previous publication. There are three discussed relationship types, i.e. part-whole, inter-operation, generalization-specialization. This taxonomy and formalization of inter-process relationships can be used by the process analyst to precisely and consistently establish any relationship which can occur in a tortuous repository of processes.

Keywords: effect annotation, relation, business process model, business process management, taxonomy, formalization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Referensi

AALST, W. M. P. V. D. & BASTEN, T., 2002. Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoretical Computer Science, 270(1), pp. 125-203.

AALST, W. M. P. V. D. & HEE, K. M. V., 1995. Framework for business process redesign. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise, pp. 36-45.

BECKER, M. & LAUE, R., 2012. A comparative survey of business process similarity measures. Computers in Industry, 63(2), pp. 148-167.

BERTOLINI, M., BEVILACQUA, M., CIARAPICA, F. E. & GIACCHETTA, G., 2011. Business process re-engineering in healthcare management: a case study. Business Process Management Journal, 17(1), pp. 42-66.

BOOCH, G., 1994. Object Oriented Analysis & Design with Application. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc..

CHUA, D. K. & HOSSAIN, M. A., 2012. Predicting change propagation and impact on design schedule due to external changes. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 59(3), pp. 483-493.

DIJKMAN, R. ET AL., 2011. Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Information Systems, 36(2), pp. 498-516.

DIJKMAN, R. M., LA ROSA, M. & REIJERS, H. A., 2012. Managing large collections of business process models-current techniques and challenges. Computers in Industry, 63(2), pp. 91--97.

DUMAS, M., GARCIA-BAÑUELOS, L., LA ROSA, M. & UBA, R., 2013. Fast detection of exact clones in business process model repositories. Information Systems, 38(4), pp. 619-633.

EKANAYAKE, C. C., LA ROSA, M., TER HOFSTEDE, A. H. & FAUVET, M.-C., 2011. Fragment-based version management for repositories of business process models. Dalam: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011. Springer, pp. 20-37.

KOLIADIS, G. & GHOSE, A., 2007. Verifying semantic business process models in inter-operation. Dalam: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, 2007. SCC 2007. IEEE, pp. 731-738.

KURNIAWAN, T. A., GHOSE, A. K., DAM, H. K. & LÊ, L.-S., 2012. Relationship-preserving change propagation in process ecosystems. Service-Oriented Computing, pp. 63-78.

KURNIAWAN, T. A., GHOSE, A. K. & LÊ, L.-S., 2011. A framework for optimizing inter-operating business process portfolio. Dalam: Information Systems Development. Springer, pp. 383-396.

KURNIAWAN, T. A., GHOSE, A. K., LÊ, L.-S. & DAM, H. K., 2012. On formalizing inter-process relationships. Business Process Management Workshops, pp. 75-86.

MAFAZI, S., GROSSMANN, G., MAYER, W. & STUMPTNER, M., 2013. On-the-fly change propagation for the co-evolution of business processes. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, pp. 75-93.

MALONE, T. W. ET AL., 1999. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science, Volume 45, pp. 425-443.

MALONE, T. W., CROWSTON, K. & HERMAN, G. A., 2003. Organizing business knowledge: the MIT process handbook. MIT press.

TODNEM By, R., 2005. Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, Volume 5, pp. 369-380.

WANG, Y., Yang, J., ZHAO, W. & SU, J., 2012. Change impact analysis in service-based business processes. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 6(2), pp. 131-149.

WEIDLICH, M., MENDLING, J. & WESKE, M., 2012. Propagating changes between aligned process models. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(8), pp. 1885-1898.

WESKE, M., 2012. Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. 2nd Edition. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

WHITE, S. A., 2004. Introduction to BPMN. BPTrends, Volume 2, pp. 1-11.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

26-09-2017

Terbitan

Bagian

Teknologi Informasi

Cara Mengutip

Taksonomi Dan Formalisasi Relasi Antar Model Proses Bisnis Berbasis Anotasi Efek. (2017). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 4(3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201743393