Critical Success Factor Proyek TI: Studi Kasus Mobile Government

Penulis

  • Ikhsan Triadi Syaputra Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Teguh Raharjo Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Bob Hardian Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Tiarma Simanungkalit Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.20231026606

Abstrak

Lembaga Pengawas XYZ adalah salah satu instansi pemerintah Indonesia yang sedang melakukan transformasi digital. Salah satu upaya transformasi digital adalah dengan mengembangkan aplikasi ABC. Aplikasi ABC merupakan aplikasi surat menyurat dan disposisi surat. Aplikasi ini merupakan aplikasi mobile government (mGovernment) yang dibangun agar pegawai Lembaga Pengawas XYZ dapat menerima tugas dan informasi melalui surat dimana saja dan kapan saja melalui perangkat smartphone. Hal ini dilakukan untuk mendukung pegawai Lembaga Pengawas XYZ yang memiliki mobilitas tinggi dalam menjalankan tugasnya sebagai auditor. Namun, proyek pengembangan aplikasi ini gagal. Ditandai dengan penyelesaian proyek yang tidak sesuai jadwal, aplikasi yang tidak sesuai harapan, dan hanya sedikit pegawai yang menggunakan aplikasi ini.  Belum adanya analisis CSF dalam proyek pengembangan aplikasi mGovernment merupakan salah satu penyebab kegagalan yang diidentifikasi pada penelitian ini. Sehingga tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mencari CSF pada proyek TI agar dapat menghindari kegagalan kedepannya. Hal ini didukung dengan belum adanya penelitian mengenai CSF pada proyek TI khususnya di mGovernment sehingga dapat memberikan kontribusi dan kebaruan untuk akademisi maupun praktisi. Penelitian ini menggunakan delapan CSF dengan lima kriteria keberhasilan. CSF kemudian diurutkan untuk menemukan prioritasnya menggunakan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari tim pengembangan aplikasi dan pakar proyek TI. Pengambilan data menggunakan kuesioner dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perencanaan merupakan faktor yang paling diprioritaskan, disusul oleh kompetensi sumber daya manusia. Sedangkan peringkat terakhir adalah manajemen pengetahuan.


Abstract

 

XYZ Supervisory Institution is one of the Indonesian government agencies that is carrying out digital transformation. One of the digital transformation efforts is developing ABC application. ABC application is a correspondence and letter disposition application. This application is a mobile government (mGovernment) application that was built so that employees of XYZ Supervisory Institution can receive assignments and information by mail anywhere and anytime via a smartphone device. This is done to support employees of the XYZ Supervisory Institution who have high mobility in carrying out their duties as auditors. However, this application development project failed. Characterized by the completion of projects that are not on schedule, applications that do not meet expectations, and only a few employees use this application. The absence of CSF analysis in mGovernment application development projects is one of the causes of failure identified in this study. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to look for CSF in IT projects in order to avoid future failures. This is supported by the absence of research on CSF in IT projects, especially in mGovernment so that it can provide contribution and novelty for academics and practitioners. This study used eight CSF with five success criteria. The CSF are then sorted to find its priority using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The data in this study were obtained from application development team and IT project experts. Collecting data using questionnaires and interviews. The results of this study indicate that planning is the most prioritized factor, followed by human resource competence. While the last rank is knowledge management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Referensi

ADYWIRATAMA, A.D., KO, C., RAHARJO, T. AND WAHBI, A., 2021. Critical success factors for ICT project: A case study in project colocation government data center. Procedia Computer Science, [online] 197(2021), pp.385–392.

AL-HUBAISHI, H.S., AHMAD, S.Z. AND HUSSAIN, M., 2017. Exploring mobile government from the service quality perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(1), pp.4–16.

AL-SAI, Z.A., ABDULLAH, R. AND HUSIN, M.H., 2020. Critical Success Factors for Big Data: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 8, pp.118940–118956.

ASADABADI, M.R., 2018. The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method. Knowledge-Based Systems, [online] 162, pp.115–123.

AXELOS AND OFFICE, S., 2017. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office.

BACCARINI, D., 2003. Critical success factors for projects. Faculty of The Built, 25(5), pp.85–117.

BPKP, 2019. Proposal Kebutuhan Pengguna (User Requirement Proposal) Sadewa. pp.1–13.

BPKP, 2020. Transformasi digital pengawasan BPKP 2020-2022.

BPKP, 2022. Sadewa - Application at Google Play. [online] Tersedia melalui: [Diakses 13 Juni 2022].

DICKINSON, R.A., FERGUSON, C.R. AND SIRCAR, S., 1984. Critical Success Factors and Small Business. American Journal of Small Business, 8(3), pp.49–57.

GUMAY, L.A., PURWANDARI, B., RAHARJO, T., WAHYUDI, A. AND PURWANINGSIH, M., 2020. Identifying Critical Success Factors for Information Technology Projects with an Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case of a Telco Company in Indonesia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp.108–112.

GUNTUR, M., PURWANDARI, B., RAHARJO, T., SOLICHAH, I. AND KUMARALALITA, L., 2018. Critical Success Factors for information systems development: A case study in e-government. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp.29–33.

KERZNER, H., 2017. Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards. 3rd ed. Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

LEIDECKER, J.K. AND BRUNO, A. V., 1984. Identifying and using critical success factors. Long Range Planning, 17(1), pp.23–32.

LILIANA, L., 2016. A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 161(1).

MARCHEWKA, J.T., 2015. Information Technology Project Management: Providing Measurable Organizational Value. 5th ed.

MUNIER, N., HONTORIA, E. AND JIMÉNEZ-SÁEZ, F., 2019. Strategic Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making.

NAPITUPULU, D., SYAFRULLAH, M., RAHIM, R., AMAR, A. AND SUCAHYO, Y.G., 2018. Content validity of critical success factors for e-Government implementation in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 352(1).

NTALIANI, M., COSTOPOULOU, C. AND KARETSOS, S., 2008. Mobile government: A challenge for agriculture. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), pp.699–716.

OUPAKAR, J. AND CHERKAOUI, A., 2019. Team performance in safety critical systems: Review and approximation by Fuzzy-AHP. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97(13), pp.3767–3782.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, 2017. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) / Project Management Institute. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc.

RAHARJO, T., PURWANDARI, B., SATRIA, R. AND SOLICHAH, I., 2018. Critical success factors for project management office: An insight from Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2018, pp.1–6.

RAM, J., CORKINDALE, D. AND WU, M.L., 2013. Implementation critical success factors (CSFs) for ERP: Do they contribute to implementation success and post-implementation performance? International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), pp.157–174.

SAATY, T.L., 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.9–26.

SAATY, T.L., 2008. Decision Making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), pp.83–95.

SAREEN, M., PUNIA, D.K. AND CHANANA, L., 2013. Exploring factors affecting use of mobile government services in India. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 11(4), pp.86–93.

SCHWALBE, K., 2015. Information Technology Project Management. 8th ed.

SEKARAN, U. AND BOUGIE, R., 2016. Research Method for Business Textbook: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102084.

SHARMA, S.K. AND GUPTA, J.N.D., 2004. Web services architecture for m-government: issues and challenges. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(4), pp.462–474.

SOMMERVILLE, I., 2011. Software Engineering (9th ed.; Boston, Ed.). Massachusetts: Pearson Education.

THOR, J., DING, S. AND KAMARUDDIN, S., 2013. Comparison of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods From The Maintenance Alternative Selection Perspective. International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES), 2, pp.27–34.

TRISNAWATY, N.W., RAHARJO, T., HARDIAN, B. AND PRASETYO, A., 2021. Success Criteria and Factor fo IT Project Application Implementation in Digital Transformation Era: A Case Study Financial Sector Industry. 2021 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS).

ZHANG, Y., SUN, J., YANG, Z. AND WANG, Y., 2018. Mobile social media in inter-organizational projects: Aligning tool, task and team for virtual collaboration effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 36(8), pp.1096–1108.

Diterbitkan

14-04-2023

Terbitan

Bagian

Ilmu Komputer

Cara Mengutip

Critical Success Factor Proyek TI: Studi Kasus Mobile Government. (2023). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 10(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.20231026606