Kumpulan Model Maturity E-Government: Sebuah Ulasan Sistematis

Penulis

Qilbaaini Effendi Muftikhali, Tony Dwi Susanto

Abstrak

Abstrak
Kemajuan pesat dalam perkembangan teknologi informasi berpengaruh secara global yang dampaknya meluas hampir ke seluruh lini masyarakat. Salah satu bentuk dampak positif dari perkembangan TIK adalah munculya sistem digitalisasi dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang dikenal sebagai Electronic Government (e- Government). Fenomena e-Government dapat didefinisikan yang mencakup semua penggunaan teknologi informasi oleh instansi pemerintah (seperti WAN, Internet, dan mobile computing) yang memiliki kemampuan untuk mengubah kondisi hubungan dengan warga, bisnis, dan pihak lain. E-Government pada saat ini masih sampai pada tahap pengembangan belum pada tahap evaluasi/penilaian e-government itu sendiri, sedangkan e-Government dapat dilihat mampu memberikan manfaat yang optimal ketika dalam kondisi mature, yaitu kondisi matang atau sempurna. Tujuan dari jurnal adalah membahas  model pengembangan  model maturity dari E-Government sesuai dengan 5 kategori Capability Maturity Models, the governmental models, the holistic appoarch models,  evolutionary e-government model maturity , dan related special purpose model serta kekurangan, kelebihan dari setiap kategorinya.
Kata kunci: E-Government,model maturity, model maturity e-Government .


Abstract
Rapid advances in information technology are globally influential whose impact extends almost to the entire community. One of the positive impacts of ICT development is the emergence of a digitalization system in government administration known as Electronic Government or e-Government. The phenomenon of e-Government can be defined that includes all the use of information technology by government agencies (such as Wide Area Network, Internet, and mobile computing) that have the ability to change condition relationships with citizens, businesses and other parties. E-Government is still at the stage of development not yet at the stage of evaluation / assessment of e-government itself, while e-Government can be seen able to provide optimal benefits when in mature conditions, ie conditions mature or perfect. The purpose of the journal is to discuss the maturity development model of E-Government according to the five categories of Capability Maturity Models, the governmental models, the holistic appoarch models, the evolutionary e-government maturity model, and related special purpose models and the shortcomings, advantages of each category.
Keywords: E-Government,model maturity, model maturity e-Government

Kata Kunci


e-government; model maturity; model maturity e-government

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi


ABDOULLAH FATH-ALLAH, L. C. Q. 2014. E-GOVERNMENT MATURITY MODELS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 5(3), 71-91.

BANK, W. 2012. http://web.worldbank.org/e-Government.

CRESSWELL, A. P. 2006. Digital capability assessment for e-Government: A multi-dimensional approach. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, Å.Grönlund, & K. V. Andersen (Eds.),. EGOV 2006, Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4084 , (pp. 293—304).

GASTÓN CONCHA, H. A. 2012. E-Government procurement observatory, maturity model and early measurements. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S43–S50.

GAULD, R. A. 2010. Do they want it? Do they use it? The demand-side of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 177–186.

GONZALO VALDÉS, M. S. 2011. Conception, development and implementation of an e-Government maturity model in public agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 176-187.

HARJALOKA, L. 2014. Studi Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia dan Negara Lainnya sebagai Solusi Pemberantasan Solusi di Sektor Publik. Jurnal RECHTSVinding, Vol 3(3), pp 435-452.

HILLER, J. S. 2001. Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-Government, 200, 162–198.

HOLLE, E. S. 2011. Pelayanan Publik Melalui Electronic Government: Upaya Meminimalisir Praktek dalam Administrasi dalam Meningkatkan Public Service. Jurnal SASI, 17, pp 21-30.

ISACA. 2013. Process Assessment Model Using COBIT 5. Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 USA: ISACA.

KAREN LAYNE, A. J. 2001. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122–136.

SIHWI, S. W. 2009. Pengembangan Process Maturity Framework pada e-Government di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

SUPANGKAT, D. S. 2006. Framework Strategi Implementasi e-Government. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi untuk Indonesia, 35-37.

SUSANTO, T. D. 2015. Measuring e-Government Implementation Program: A Case Study of Surabaya City, Indonesia. International Journal of Information Systems and Engineering.

TECHNOLOGY, C. F. 2002. E-Government Handbook.

TOASAKI, Y. 2003. e-Government from A User’s Perspective. . APEC telecommunication and information working group.

WIMMER, M. A. 2002. Online one-stop government: A working framework and requirements. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.). Information systems: The e-Business challenge, pp. 117−130.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201744367